Equity markets were mixed this week alongside a quiet and mostly subdued run of economic data.
The S&P 500 rose 0.6%, led by Consumer Discretionary and Energy, while Technology took a back seat for a change. The index is now up a hefty 25% in the past year amid disinflation and sturdy growth.
Meantime, the TSX dipped 0.4%, with Technology, Utilities and banks weighing. While still solid, the 10% one-year gain in Canadian stocks continues to lag their U.S. peers.
Note: Sadiq Adatia is away this week. Filling in is Fred Demers, Director, Multi-Asset Solutions.
Canada vs. U.S.
If you look beyond this month, or even this year, it’s been a difficult time for Canadian equities relative to the United States. In fact, it’s been challenging for just about every market versus the U.S. The comparative lack of Technology in the Canadian market and stronger overall U.S. economic momentum are among the factors contributing to the gap between the two countries’ equity markets. Concerns about trade wars are also rising, with a second Trump administration potentially on the horizon and the Biden administration already increasing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). These tariffs are theoretical in a sense because China isn’t exporting many EVs just yet, but the writing is on the wall—soon, they’ll be flooding the market, and retaliation is possible. This ratcheting up of trade tensions is part of the broader trend of ‘reshoring’—the U.S.’s attempt to shift manufacturing away from places like China and back to America and its close allies. Canada isn’t currently benefitting from those efforts; it’s more of a Mexico story, with the U.S. investing more in that country. (Interestingly, China is also investing more in Mexico in an attempt to get around U.S. tariffs.) To return to Tech: it is shielded somewhat from these trade tensions because China isn’t a core market for its products. That’s contributed to its market-leading performance and is another reason why U.S. equity markets have outpaced their Canadian counterparts.
U.S. economic resilience and the relative lack of Technology in Canadian markets are driving the gap between U.S. and Canadian equities, with Canada also failing to benefit from U.S. reshoring efforts.
Bond Volatility
Recently, we’ve seen more volatility in bonds than in equities. What does this imply for asset allocators, and should investors expect it to continue for the rest of the year? It’s important to first consider the source of the volatility. Equity markets have been forced to digest the fact that the U.S. economy will likely remain stronger for longer, and that corporate earnings will therefore also be stronger. As a result, the fear of the impact of high rates has diminished. That leaves the bond market on its own to evaluate the potential timing of rate cuts. It’s this uncertainty that has caused volatility in fixed income—predicting the U.S. Federal Reserve’s (Fed) actions is rarely easy, and it’s been especially challenging lately because economic data over the past couple of months has been more ambiguous. There does appear to be increasing comfort in bond markets that two rate cuts can be expected this year, most likely in September and November or December. Talk of a rate hike appears to be over, which means that asset allocators should feel more comfortable coming back to bonds. That said, the duration play will not be easy to execute; the yield curve remains inverted and the 10-year rate is a real question mark because a mild rate-cut cycle could leave long-term yields little changed. Duration plays tend to be most beneficial during hard-landing scenarios, which appears unlikely in the U.S. By contrast, in our view, slower growth makes Canadian duration potentially more attractive.
Bottom Line: Economic resilience and strong earnings have given equity markets the luxury of ignoring the interest rate debate to a degree, while bond markets have had no choice but to play the Fed’s game, leading to heightened volatility.
Europe
Political winds are changing in Europe. Polls show that the Labour party is likely to secure a majority government in the U.K. general election on July 4, while Marine Le Pen’s National Rally are the favourites to win France’s parliamentary elections, to take place in two rounds in late June and early July. This increases uncertainty in both of those countries and, to a certain extent, the rest of Europe as well. The good news for investors is that, as we saw with Brexit, contagion from domestic political developments tends to be limited across the continent. Despite political noise, both the U.K. and France are on the path of improving growth outlooks. The political risks for markets have also changed—it used to be that right-wing parties gaining steam meant the potential breakup of the European Union (E.U.). More recently, however, the platforms of parties like Le Pen’s National Rally have shifted somewhat towards the middle. Italy is a good example: in the past, some in Italy’s right wing have supported “Italexit”—Italy’s proposed departure from the E.U. But since the election of right-wing prime minister Giorgia Meloni in 2022, her party hasn’t made it a priority.
From a market perspective, elections in the U.K. and France are likely to be more signal than noise, though they may cause some short-term volatility.
The viewpoints expressed by the Portfolio Manager represents their assessment of the markets at the time of publication. Those views are subject to change without notice at any time without any kind of notice. The information provided herein does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy, or an offer to sell securities nor should the information be relied upon as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This communication is intended for informational purposes only.
BMO Global Asset Management is a brand name under which BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc. operate.
Any statement that necessarily depends on future events may be a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although such statements are based on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations. Investors are cautioned not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. In connection with any forward-looking statements, investors should carefully consider the areas of risk described in the most recent simplified prospectus.
This article is for information purposes. The information contained herein is not, and should not be construed as, investment, tax or legal advice to any party. Investments should be evaluated relative to the individual’s investment objectives and professional advice should be obtained with respect to any circumstance.
Commissions, management fees and expenses (if applicable) all may be associated with investments in mutual funds. Trailing commissions may be associated with investments in certain series of securities of mutual funds. Please read the fund facts, ETF facts or prospectus of the relevant mutual fund before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.
For a summary of the risks of an investment in the BMO Mutual Funds, please see the specific risks set out in the prospectus. ETF Series of the BMO Mutual Funds trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.
BMO Mutual Funds are managed by BMO Investments Inc., which is an investment fund manager and a separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal.
®/™Registered trademarks/trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.
Shifting to Neutral: The Case for Optimistic Caution
In early June, the Bank of Canada (BoC) became the first of the world’s major central banks to lower interest rates, cutting by 25 basis points. a day before the European Central Bank (ECB) made the same move. But in the United States, it is a different story.
This information is for Investment Advisors only. By accepting, you certify that you are an Investment Advisor. If you are NOT an Investment Advisor, please decline and view the content in the Investor or Institutional areas of the site. The website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide a complete description of BMO Global Asset Management’s products or services. Past performance is not indicative of future results. It should not be construed as investment advice or relied upon in making an investment decision. The opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Products and services of BMO Global Asset Management are only offered in jurisdictions where they may be lawfully offered for sale. The information contained in this website does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone to buy or sell any investment fund or other product, service or information to anyone in any jurisdiction in which an offer or solicitation is not authorized or cannot be legally made or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make an offer of solicitation. All products and services are subject to the terms of each and every applicable agreement. It is important to note that not all products, services and information are available in all jurisdictions outside Canada.
Chairman Powell: The Ultimate Bond Villain?
June 24 to 28, 2024
Chairman Powell: The Ultimate Bond Villain?
June 24 to 28, 2024
Frederick Demers, MA
Market Recap
Note: Sadiq Adatia is away this week. Filling in is Fred Demers, Director, Multi-Asset Solutions.
Canada vs. U.S.
If you look beyond this month, or even this year, it’s been a difficult time for Canadian equities relative to the United States. In fact, it’s been challenging for just about every market versus the U.S. The comparative lack of Technology in the Canadian market and stronger overall U.S. economic momentum are among the factors contributing to the gap between the two countries’ equity markets. Concerns about trade wars are also rising, with a second Trump administration potentially on the horizon and the Biden administration already increasing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). These tariffs are theoretical in a sense because China isn’t exporting many EVs just yet, but the writing is on the wall—soon, they’ll be flooding the market, and retaliation is possible. This ratcheting up of trade tensions is part of the broader trend of ‘reshoring’—the U.S.’s attempt to shift manufacturing away from places like China and back to America and its close allies. Canada isn’t currently benefitting from those efforts; it’s more of a Mexico story, with the U.S. investing more in that country. (Interestingly, China is also investing more in Mexico in an attempt to get around U.S. tariffs.) To return to Tech: it is shielded somewhat from these trade tensions because China isn’t a core market for its products. That’s contributed to its market-leading performance and is another reason why U.S. equity markets have outpaced their Canadian counterparts.
U.S. economic resilience and the relative lack of Technology in Canadian markets are driving the gap between U.S. and Canadian equities, with Canada also failing to benefit from U.S. reshoring efforts.
Bond Volatility
Recently, we’ve seen more volatility in bonds than in equities. What does this imply for asset allocators, and should investors expect it to continue for the rest of the year? It’s important to first consider the source of the volatility. Equity markets have been forced to digest the fact that the U.S. economy will likely remain stronger for longer, and that corporate earnings will therefore also be stronger. As a result, the fear of the impact of high rates has diminished. That leaves the bond market on its own to evaluate the potential timing of rate cuts. It’s this uncertainty that has caused volatility in fixed income—predicting the U.S. Federal Reserve’s (Fed) actions is rarely easy, and it’s been especially challenging lately because economic data over the past couple of months has been more ambiguous. There does appear to be increasing comfort in bond markets that two rate cuts can be expected this year, most likely in September and November or December. Talk of a rate hike appears to be over, which means that asset allocators should feel more comfortable coming back to bonds. That said, the duration play will not be easy to execute; the yield curve remains inverted and the 10-year rate is a real question mark because a mild rate-cut cycle could leave long-term yields little changed. Duration plays tend to be most beneficial during hard-landing scenarios, which appears unlikely in the U.S. By contrast, in our view, slower growth makes Canadian duration potentially more attractive.
Bottom Line: Economic resilience and strong earnings have given equity markets the luxury of ignoring the interest rate debate to a degree, while bond markets have had no choice but to play the Fed’s game, leading to heightened volatility.
Europe
Political winds are changing in Europe. Polls show that the Labour party is likely to secure a majority government in the U.K. general election on July 4, while Marine Le Pen’s National Rally are the favourites to win France’s parliamentary elections, to take place in two rounds in late June and early July. This increases uncertainty in both of those countries and, to a certain extent, the rest of Europe as well. The good news for investors is that, as we saw with Brexit, contagion from domestic political developments tends to be limited across the continent. Despite political noise, both the U.K. and France are on the path of improving growth outlooks. The political risks for markets have also changed—it used to be that right-wing parties gaining steam meant the potential breakup of the European Union (E.U.). More recently, however, the platforms of parties like Le Pen’s National Rally have shifted somewhat towards the middle. Italy is a good example: in the past, some in Italy’s right wing have supported “Italexit”—Italy’s proposed departure from the E.U. But since the election of right-wing prime minister Giorgia Meloni in 2022, her party hasn’t made it a priority.
From a market perspective, elections in the U.K. and France are likely to be more signal than noise, though they may cause some short-term volatility.
Positioning
For a detailed breakdown of our portfolio positioning, check out the latest BMO GAM House View Report, titled Shifting to Neutral: The Case for Optimistic Caution.
Disclosures:
The viewpoints expressed by the Portfolio Manager represents their assessment of the markets at the time of publication. Those views are subject to change without notice at any time without any kind of notice. The information provided herein does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy, or an offer to sell securities nor should the information be relied upon as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This communication is intended for informational purposes only.
BMO Global Asset Management is a brand name under which BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc. operate.
Any statement that necessarily depends on future events may be a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although such statements are based on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations. Investors are cautioned not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. In connection with any forward-looking statements, investors should carefully consider the areas of risk described in the most recent simplified prospectus.
This article is for information purposes. The information contained herein is not, and should not be construed as, investment, tax or legal advice to any party. Investments should be evaluated relative to the individual’s investment objectives and professional advice should be obtained with respect to any circumstance.
Commissions, management fees and expenses (if applicable) all may be associated with investments in mutual funds. Trailing commissions may be associated with investments in certain series of securities of mutual funds. Please read the fund facts, ETF facts or prospectus of the relevant mutual fund before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.
For a summary of the risks of an investment in the BMO Mutual Funds, please see the specific risks set out in the prospectus. ETF Series of the BMO Mutual Funds trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.
BMO Mutual Funds are managed by BMO Investments Inc., which is an investment fund manager and a separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal.
®/™Registered trademarks/trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.
Insights
Shifting to Neutral: The Case for Optimistic Caution
BMO ETF Portfolios’ June commentary: “Downshift to Neutral”
Counting on 24-Karat Rate Cuts
Bridging the “Alternatives Gap”
The Evergreen Solution
Introducing Altitude